Following is a comparison with the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 OS Art, the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR and the Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC (1st generation). The Sigma was shot on a D810 with an older, less contrasty print of the test-target and a little less sharpening of 35/0.5/36/10: Above: Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC G2 on D850 at 24mm, f2.8

Above: Nikon 24-70/2.8E ED VR on a D810 at 70mm, f2.8, 64 ISO. Above: Nikon 24-70/2.8G ED on a D800 at 70mm, f2.8, 100 ISO. Above: Tamron SP 24-70/2.8 VC on a D800 at 70mm, f2.8, 100 ISO. When compared to its predecessor and its main competitor the new lens shows the best FX-corner of the bunch. And at the shorter focal lengths by a large margin! Sigma does a good job of taking indoor photos. But Nikon produces the natural color more. Nikon is noticeably longer than Sigma when it pulls the 70mm. When it comes to shooting the moving objects both lenses struggle a bit. They keep losing focus. But overall Nikon 24-70mm does a better job than the Sigma 24-70mm.

The 24-70mm f/2.8 VR is a great lens! When I had a D750, my 24-70mm remained fixed on it 95% of the time. 24-70mm is a excellent focal length for many functions. Nikon33's gear list: Nikon33's gear list

See It Read Our Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Review. 4.0 . Excellent . Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S. $2,696.95 at Amazon See It Read Our Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S Review.
.
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/274
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/95
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/333
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/330
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/30
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/389
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/440
  • cfnm3jaeqe.pages.dev/126

    • nikon 24 70mm f2 8 vr review